|
|
|
|  |
|
Discussion Topic
|
Creator
|
um
sex pistols copiersssssssssssssss
|
skank_dog |
|
|
Replys
|
Listener
|
| No. Buzzcocks did something special. They didn't try to be like Sex Pistols. They made great music. I love Buzzcocks. | Green_Hell |
| What's with these morons comparing Buzzcocks to Sex Pistols. Hello, Sex Pistols are fucken sacred. Buzzcocks are like fucken badass. Not as great as Sex Pistols, but you cannot say they fucken copied Sex Pistols. It just comes to show how ignorant and iliterate people are when it comes to punk music. Have you ever heard about The Adicts? | ILoveSidVicious |
| sorry, illiterate | ILoveSidVicious |
man, the 'cocks are NOTHING like the
Pistols.
both were special bands, but the buzzcocks
were the original pop punk band, whereas Sex
Pistols were the original punk band. | lobotomyactivist-II |
Actually the first pop punk band was the
Undertones I beleave. And the Sex Pistols
were the first HUGE punk band but not the
first. The're were several punk bands in
pubs and crap before the Sex Pistols, and The
Damned released the first punk single. | L1th1um |
yeah, I was saying original in a sense like
"early", not "first"
sorry if it was unclear | lobotomyactivist-II |
| Oh I see. | L1th1um |
you guys need to stop worrying about who
copied who, cause it doesn't matter. the sex
pistols were cool, but if it hadn't been for
the New York Dolls, the Modern Lovers, the
Stooges, the MC5, and the Ramones---they
wouldn't have existed. they were a shock
band. they were the 1977 version of marilyn
manson, and in my book, way overrated. they
did inspire alot of people to start bands,
but most of those bands turned out better.
the buzzcocks are a perfect example. also,
you could say that supergrass
"copies" the buzzcocks, but they
are still one of the best bands on the planet
today, so who cares? | zelig77 |
| |
|
Add to Profile
